Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buchacher

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Mackensen (talk) 00:48, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Buchacher
vanityGeni 02:22, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete. Vanity. --Sn0wflake 04:18, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. (Will everyone please bear in mind Don't bite the newcomers. "Vanity" is a Wikipedia jargon term that may cause offence to contributors, even though that's unintentional.) Wikipedia is an encyclopedia I'm afraid, not a resource for people's family stories. This is best recorded on a personal website. Trilobite (Talk) 14:18, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: let me rephrase, then. The Wikipedia follows a series of standards and conventions; it would be nice if you could check the Help section. This sort of contribution would better fit an user-space. To create one you just need to create an article like this: User:YourAlias/Something. Hope that clarifies things. Well, in the end of the day it is still vanity. ;) Cheers. --Sn0wflake 18:24, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and this article is not vanity, it's genealogy, which is why it belongs on VfD. Wyss 20:18, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Genealogy. An encyclopedia is not the right place to put it in. Zzyzx11 00:58, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete genealogy Ana Jessica 06:42, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)