Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bucky Phillips manhunt controversy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. It is noted that there is also no prejudice to merging, and that can always be done post-AFD, with additional discussion and consensus-building if necessary. –MuZemike 00:17, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Bucky Phillips manhunt controversy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

A BLP article that, by its very nature, can never be neutral point-of-view D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  04:36, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, significantly covered by reliable sources, and thus notable. No explanation of the purported non-neutrality is provided. Peter Karlsen (talk) 05:18, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep or Merge. Keep for the reasons above.  Merge because the controversy article is fairly short, as is the Bucky Phillips article.  I don't see any reason why it needs to be spread out over two pages. Bds69 (talk) 13:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Indifferent to whether or not it remains separate or is merged.  I'm the editor who forked this out of the articlespace in the first place, and if I recall correctly (it was 4 years ago) it was in response to a consensus that the material, though appropriately cited and supported in secondary sources, threatened to overwhelm the biographical article and needed to be forked out on its own.  Ford MF (talk) 18:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * merge Not necessary or appropriate as a separate article.    DGG ( talk ) 01:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.