Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/București Mall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

București Mall

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only contains 2 sources one of which is a wp:primary source. I can't find any other sources for this mall. Fails WP:GNG Me5000 (talk) 01:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment There seem to be Romanian sources at ro:București Mall.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  01:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep ample sources in the German and Romanian articles to establish notability. Arsenikk (talk)  21:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - the Romanian article appears to have enough sources, so if used here, it would be WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:38, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - The Romanian sources in the Romanian article does seem to indicated passing WP:GNG. Don't know how the could not find other sources beside those listed in this article when all they had to do was click on the Romanian one and see them.--Oakshade (talk) 00:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.