Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buda, Nebraska


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:33, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Buda, Nebraska

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Nebraska Place Names mentions a railroad station here; no evidence of a notable community. –dlthewave ☎ 18:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 08:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Nebraska. –dlthewave ☎ 18:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment what township is it in, if any? Would that be a possible redirect target?  Does it still exist?  There is no content here other than a name and an indication that a post office might have once been located there.  Google Search results are filled with auto-generated spam, and also references to a place in Lancaster County, Nebraska, but nothing reliable about this one. Walt Yoder (talk) 16:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. Fitzpatrick's Nebraska Place-Names refers to Buda as "town" (back when it was called Shelby). It's unclear from the text whether the place had ever been incorporated (which would make it inherently notable) or if it's just a sloppy use of the term, but it's probably worth searching for additional sources before deleting this for good.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 3, 2023 ; 05:20 (UTC) 05:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails GNG and NGEO. Another place name connected to the wave of CE immigation, but no indication this meets GEO. If any sources exist, I think they will be in sources about Hungarian immigration, not railroad sources. Ping me if sources are found and added to article.  // Timothy :: talk  05:34, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Kearn(e)y Station (1866), Shelby (1876), Buda (1878) Was prominent enough at the time for an appearance in Around the World in Eighty Days, but don't confuse with the stage stop. fiveby(zero) 21:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * was carried by a number of Nebraska papers and has The most famous was Kearney station. This was located across the Platte river from old Fort Kearney... but unfortunately goes on to confuse with Fort Kearny Station the stage stop west of the fort.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment: WP:GEOLAND requires non-trivial sources to meet GNG for places lacking legal recognition. The above are simple mentions, nothing which meets SIGCOV for passing GNG; they show nothing other than existence and existence doesn't mean notability.  // Timothy :: talk  11:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * You bolded added to article above, so adding to the article i was. There's not a great deal to say about "Buda: The oldest "Town" in Buffalo County" but there is something mildly interesting, it just takes a bit of time and effort. But if WP:GEOLAND frowns on unincorporated places, railroad stations and immigration from central Europe and calls for it to be deleted, then i've sure got better thing to do than go looking for sources. fiveby(zero) 13:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep satisfies GNG for places. Djflem (talk) 14:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep (barely): The source above "Buda: The oldest "Town" in Buffalo County" is interesting. It clearly existed and has a some history. Its not a BLP, so think this article won't hurt anything if it remains. The above source persuades me more that there would probably be information in immigration sources. A local historical society might be able to point to sources. I'll own up to a bit or two of ILIKEIT on this one.  // Timothy :: talk  15:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * On the edge of OR and RS, but 19th century should probably get a little break, it's a lot more work. The real value to WP here i think will be a link to Moses H. Sydenham. fiveby(zero) 15:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep (nom) now that we have some sources and history. –dlthewave ☎ 00:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.