Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Budd burton moss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No objection to userfying the article for an editor to work on it, but consensus is to delete Fritzpoll (talk) 13:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Budd burton moss

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unable to verify any information in article of living person. The links in the "References" section provide no actual information, nor do they verify any facts given. Radiant chains (talk) 22:32, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I was able to find a few sources mentioning this person, but nothing that warrants mention in an encyclopedia. Article does not seem to meet notability guidelines, and is also written like a resume. Additionally, nom is right, none of the "references" listed mention the person doing anything of note, and definitely not what is claimed in the article. Wacko  Jack O   01:07, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources indicate he exists, but that is about the extent of the coverage. Ironholds (talk) 01:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Bud Burton Moss has been an agent in Hollywood, representing Rita Hayworth, Cyd Charisse, Tom Bosley, Gary Coleman and Norman Fell; successful yes, legendary, no. Mandsford (talk) 15:04, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * KEEP & FIX OR MERGE he's notable enough to be a included, tho i admit not a major player. the bio needs serious cleanup, but info about him would be useful & of interest to somebody doing serious research on the US film industry in the 20th century.  perhaps we could lump him into another article someplace? (can't we refer articles like this to a working group on "hollywood" or something, & let them deal with it, as more expert opinions?) Lx 121 (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 'Follow-up: did some minor copyedit type fixes & moved the page to a properly capitalized version of the name. NOT INTENDED TO OBSTRUCT THE DEBATE HERE, it was just bugging me that it wasn't properly capitalized...  will do more fixes, if the page is still around Lx 121 (talk) 12:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.