Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buddhavanam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 19:36, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Buddhavanam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:ORGCRIT and general rules for notability --Madds212 (talk) 18:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment Discussion page was created without the afd2 template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I have no opinion on the nomination itself.   If you wish to make further AfD nominations in the future, please fully follow the instructions at WP:AFDHOWTO.  Thank you.  --Finngall talk  17:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk  17:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk  17:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Oppose deletion. This theme park appears to be notable. A quick search on Google resulted in, , , etc.  JimRenge (talk) 18:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Quick keep per arguments provided by .-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 08:41, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment see also Talk:Buddhavanam. JimRenge (talk) 10:44, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - while the current article is lacking sources, there are plenty available: the ones has found and many more. Hugsyrup 16:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - as per JimRenge. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:17, 28 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.