Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buddhism and Racism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:42, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Buddhism and Racism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not much to warrant an article, and I am not seeing that much in WP:BEFORE, through I think there is scope for expansion. But in the current form it's a stubby mess that's close to WP:TNT level. Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:19, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  09:19, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  09:19, 29 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete or Userfy if the creator wants to develop it. It's possible the subject is a notable one, but there's negligible substance here now. For such a loaded topic, that's important. Thus better to have nothing than what's there. I will say that the one source it does cite may be notable enough for an article on its own. I found these if someone wants to start that (in which case this could be redirected, I guess):   &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk \\ 14:46, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Userfy per ' arguments. Though he/she only provides one source, I am confident that Buddhist studies have at least some coverage of this subject, since Buddhist studies are filled with studies about social problems. So the subject is notable, though the article is not much yet.-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 17:11, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete completely WP:OR and either way it is redundant. शिव साहिल/Shiv Sahil (talk) 16:26, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Please expand, . Why is the article OR or redundant?-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 09:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.