Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buddy Schwimmer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Close to no consensus. (non-admin closure)  J 947  06:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Buddy Schwimmer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While Schwimmer's children seem to be notable, he does not seem to pass the notability threshold. Most of the coverage of him is incidental to the coverage of his children. John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * keep He is a dance coach/choreographer who apparently taught his own kids, who became notable dancers, so it's not exaclty WP:INHERIT, more like a notable coach. But I did scal  a couple of news searches and there are stories about his activities.  looks like it just needs editing, sourcing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 📞 What I've done 02:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 February 28.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 04:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:23, 8 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep has sufficient coverage in WP:RS to pass WP:GNG:, , and is blue-linked in our own article on a dance he is credited with creating, Nightclub two step. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The LA Times section is good but the other is a local paper—significant coverage requires that we have way more than that... czar  02:30, 22 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.