Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Budo: The way of the warrior


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The policy-based arguments in this matter are entirely on one side. Courcelles 02:18, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Budo: The way of the warrior

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

non notable film Wuh  Wuz  Dat  15:38, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTABILITY. Tyrol5   [Talk]  15:46, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't need to delete Budo: The way of the warrior cause is really exist, just check it the documentary link: http://vimeo.com/13405583 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lanalilu (talk • contribs) 16:26, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Existence is not in question here, Notability is. Wuh  Wuz  Dat  16:28, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong delete per nom. I don't mean to be rude, but the video is a joke to a native ja editor. Oda Mari (talk) 18:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources and no indication of notability. Existence isn't notability. Astudent0 (talk) 18:35, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. While it is more easily searchable under its original Italian release name of Budo la via del guerriero, it has no sourcable notability. If this changes, its return might be considered. But til then... Ciao.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:10, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Chris (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't delete of course exist Budo: The way of the warrior, but the important is the first documentary in the world for Haiku and Budo together, that's news for WP! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.82.20.255 (talk) 16:26, 10 August 2010 (UTC) — 151.82.20.255 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete - no independent coverage, no reliable sources. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:14, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't delete you can find information looking the tv logo inside the documentary and most important searching in the web and magazine, cause nobody produced an original video like that. Bye! --Oscaf (talk) 23:41, 10 August 2010 (UTC) — User:Oscaf (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete No independent sources, non-notable. Papaursa (talk) 00:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't delete it's ok, a real tv transmit that, so non sense to delete. --Sugargreen (talk) 01:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC) — User:Sugargreen (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment to the "keep" opinions: With respects.... we grant that it aired. What is required though is that the article show independent notability, in ANY language, through articles and reviews about the film. That it aired is simply not enough.  Yes, it may be a unique film.  But Wikipedia is not the place to "announce" it or make an unsupported claims about its "uniqueness".  See WP:NOTNEWS.  What we require is significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the film.  If those come forward, this AFD could turn right around.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:14, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * (Italian)


 * Reply* let me ask you, why an original documentary like that no good for WP, while a fan film that violated the copyright is in WP like hollywood movie http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_Gear_Solid:_Philanthropy ??? --Sugargreen (talk) 01:49, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I can only suggest you read WP:Notability (films) and seek understanding for both cases.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * No need to delete* is unbelieveble that a fan film non notable film is in WP http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_Gear_Solid:_Philanthropy independent notability as for my self the documentary is good. --Ramadada (talk) 02:38, 11 August 2010 (UTC) — User:Ramadada (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The discussion here is not a vote. And read WP:ILIKEIT, as an eventual decision to keep or delete is not based upon personal opinions of "good" or "bad"... it's about coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject, or meeting one of the inclusion criteria at WP:NF. Bring forth articles offering reviews or crtitical commentary and the article has a far better chance of remaining.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Following other comments above, this does not appear to be a notable subject. Janggeom (talk) 07:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.