Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buen Chico


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. v/r - TP 01:31, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Buen Chico

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:MUSIC Jason Quinn (talk) 23:50, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 00:08, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 00:08, 23 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Some RS about. From Glasswerk.co.uk which has an editor and paid reviewers: "Reviews \\ Buen Chico - Killing Somebody" "News \\ Buen Chico, Bon Genre!" "Reviews \\ Buen Chico - Gold From Lead" "Reviews \\ Buen Chico - Giving Your Gifts" Huddersfield Daily Examiner: "Chico, stars in waiting?" Music Week: "Music Upfront - 13.10.07" Sandman (magazine): Buen Chico Our Love's Enormous SoundsXP: Buen Chico Interview JORGENEV 00:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, this sounds indicative of notability:
 * Buen Chico will return to the stage to showcase new material from their forthcoming EP due for release in early 2011, before embarking on a national tour. Since forming in 2005, the Leeds based geek-pop outfit have played alongside such acts as The Long Blondes, Nine Black Alps, Eugene McGuinness, Forward Russia, Good Shoes, Pete & the Pirates and The Cribs. Songs from their two critically acclaimed albums; ‘Right to Rearrange’ and ‘Our Love’s Enormous’ have been played on 6 Music, Radio 1 and Radio 2 by the likes of Zane Lowe, Marc Riley, Huw Stephens and Steve Lamacq. -Leeds College of Music
 * At least, I am impressed by the quantity of blue links. JORGENEV 19:10, 24 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. My conclusions are the same as Jason Quinn Edwardx (talk) 11:41, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as Jorgenev has shown, this article meets WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 13:02, 23 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Per Jorgenev. Article has significant coverage in reliable third party sources. Alpha Quadrant    talk    16:30, 23 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment - there's one source in that article and it's a myspace link. It's one thing to say an article has "significant coverage". It's another to actually provide links and source the article. I don't know if Glasswerk and examiner are what I call "significant". Jason Quinn (talk) 17:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * See the links above provided by Jorgenev. Alpha Quadrant    talk    21:21, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I saw them already, that's why I mentioned Glasswork and Examiner by name. Why did you think I mentioned them? Jason Quinn (talk) 18:22, 24 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - The band, as I cant tell has yet to do any more than release a few songs. No EP or album .  The coverage in Glasswerks is of the gee whiz, this band is cool variety.  The Huddersfield Examiner essentially covering a band that might be going places.  No prejudice to recreation if they do manage something in the future, but right now, they don't meet the inclusion criteria. -- Whpq (talk) 15:51, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Incorrect - they released a full LP back in 2007, as well as three 7" singles in 2006-07. GiantSnowman 20:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the correction. I still don't see them meeting notability with this additional information. -- Whpq (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.