Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bueno Nacho (Fast-food franchise)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete all. Secret account 20:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Bueno Nacho (Fast-food franchise)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The articles show no evidence of notability, there is no evidence of significant coverage by reliable, independent secondary sources (there are no secondary sources at all). Merging the pages together would likely also be inapproriate as there is no evidence that Locations of Kim Possible is a notable topic that has been covered by secondary sources. If the locations mentioned are important to the series then they should be mentioned in the article for the series (Kim Possible); Notability is not inherited (links to essay). WP:V states that "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." - no reliable, third-party sources are given in the articles and I think it is unlikely that any exist to be found.

I am also nominating the following articles for the same reasons:
 * Camp Wannaweep
 * Cuddle buddy (Kim Possible)
 * Middleton (fictional city)

Guest9999 (talk) 18:11, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete all. They may be notable within the scope of the series, but absolutely no out-of-universe notability is asserted here. I share the nom's doubts that reliable third-party sources can be found on any of this fancruft. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Fiction is self reverencing, a citation to an episode is = to a third party citation. - perfectblue (talk) 19:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge all Since I've contributed significantly to the nominated pages, I hate to see them go. They might not be notable enough for individual pages, but easily notable enough within the Kim Possible universe when merged into one general page. How does "Locations in Kim Possible" sound? =) Jumping   cheese  07:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Could you provide any reliable independent sources that such an article would be based around? Guest9999 (talk) 08:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)]]
 * The episodes themselves? Oh, and agree with perfectblue's suggestion to suspend nomination until a consensus can be formed in the other discussion. Jumping   cheese  03:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The episodes aren't independent sources. Guest9999 (talk) 17:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Suspend There is currently a significant debate going on at Wikipedia talk:Television episodes Please suspend this AFD until consensus has been reached as to the direction of television content on Wikipedia. perfectblue (talk) 19:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Response The discussion you mention is about televison episodes, this AfD is not about televison episodes, it is about other fictional elements. One major difference between the two concepts is that a television episode is a real thing, the fictional locations nominated are not. Also, like the many other centralised discussions on the issue I doubt anything will come out of this one; if a clear cut consensus is formed, the decision made here can be revisited. As it stands the articles are unsourced and show no evidence that they will ever meet the primary notability criteria. Guest9999 (talk) 05:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)]]
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  (note: I didn't make the relist myself)


 * Delete all; these are very minor bits of fancruft that deserve a sentence or two, at most, in the main series article, or in articles about episodes. --MCB (talk) 06:48, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.