Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buglist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. While sources were produced, they appear to be insufficient to show notability. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  03:01, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Buglist

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 02:28, 22 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:45, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep: Notable software in so much as it has a good sized user base. as can be seen here and here. The softare provides a useful service to users. The software seems to be used within the scope of Eclipse it's self too, and has some coverage on Eclipse mailing lists. The software also has some coverage in Eclipse User Circles. Not to mention the fact the linked pages do address Significant Coverage and, as the linked article says "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material". Cheers, Jonomacdrones  (talk)  16:21, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Two download sites and a tutorial is not significant coverage. Joe Chill (talk) 16:23, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no coverage in reliable sources. The project's sourceforge page and a web forum do not constitute reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:42, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:46, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unable to find any significant coverage in independent sources. --Cyber cobra (talk) 00:02, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.