Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BuildProfessional


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 05:12, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

BuildProfessional

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence that this programming language is notable. Searching finds only misreadings of the word pair "build professional". — Keφr 07:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - unreferenced software stub article of unclear notability; a search turned up no significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 15:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete&mdash;Just one passing reference in google scholar. Not finding anything else significant outside of the company website.  Lesser Cartographies (talk) 20:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable and lacks WP:RS .Could not find much other then from the company website.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:05, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.