Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Build the Enterprise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  22:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Build the Enterprise

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This page is about a website and accompanying petition urging construction of the Starship Enterprise from Star Trek. The coverage seems to fail the criteria at WP:EVENTCRITERIA relating to enduring significance (indeed, the website is now dead) and treats it more as a curiosity than as something worthy of coverage due to its significance. To the extent this belongs anywhere on Wikipedia at all (which is highly debatable), it could be covered in a single-sentence mention at the Enterprise's page. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 21:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. &#123;{u&#124;  Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 21:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. &#123;{u&#124;  Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 21:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. &#123;{u&#124;  Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 21:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. &#123;{u&#124;  Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 21:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I feel like the information in this article can be kept in some form, though perhaps not in a dedicated article on this topic. It could be merged into Starship Enterprise. BD2412  T 21:59, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete basically this fails any reasonable interpretation of not news guidelines. This got a little passing news coverage, nothing more, and there is nothing substantial here. Not even evidence that the true oddity of this movement was in any way related to the changing of government petition response rules.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete A Trekkie with a dream, nothing more. Nothing notable. Oaktree b (talk) 04:05, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems more promotional than anything, fails GNG.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:36, 29 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.