Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Building 126 (Washington Navy Yard)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Washington Navy Yard. The Bushranger One ping only 22:48, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Building 126 (Washington Navy Yard)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Being eligible for listing in the national register is not the same as being actually in the national register. Not yet notable.  DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:36, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:36, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:36, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Even if it is listed it would probably be as part of a wider collection of buildings and not individually. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete or if possible merge. Clearly not notable on its own, but the article does contain some information that could be useful if someone could find a relevant article to put it on. JDDJS (talk) 16:44, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 13:42, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge to Washington Navy Yard.  Per nom, this is notyet.  Don't delete as information is valuable and sourced.   78.26   (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 16:33, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Washington Navy Yard. If the building is listed on the register, then the article can be restored easily enough.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:13, 8 March 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.