Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buimerc Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 13:30, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Buimerc Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines. None of the refs currently in the article relate to the company concerned. In a quick search of the web, I couldn't find much coverage in secondary sources. There's a few remarks in passing, as a result of the company's sponsorship of 7EmiratesRun, and a quote from chairman Siddharth Balachandran relating to a budget announcement. None of that satisfies the guidelines set out at WP:CORP. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 16:45, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment an article on this company has been submitted twice before and deleted under speedy deletion criteria G11 as unambiguous advertising or promotion. Whilst I don't believe the latest article reads from a WP:NPOV, assuming good faith it has been written in a slightly more encyclopedic fashion & hence I deemed it's intent sufficiently ambiguous that I brought to AfD to generate a discussion around notability (and hence whether it's worthwhile re-writing/cleaning up) rather than speedy deleting. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 16:52, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. very borderlone notability at best, and still considerably promotional A small trading company. The principle at issue is NOT DIRECTORY, which supersedes even the guideline of the GNG. `` - DGG, 23:25, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as News and browsers found a few links but certainly nothing convincingly better. Notifying tagger . SwisterTwister   talk  06:23, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. neither the company or its managing director are notable. It can be difficult to judge the typical NE and SAsian conglomerates, and the only factor I trust is overall size: there are many much larger than his. I am not prepared to go very far in accepting the reliability for purposes of establishing notability in any source in that region--it's even more PR dominated than the US. Furthermore, the technique of writing about both a borderline notable firm and its borderline notable executive is promotional, and to be strongly discouraged. When they are both written by the same spa, I assume a conflict of interest, and a very likely violation of our  (and generally ) The best course is such cases is to remove them until a npov editor appears DGG ( talk ) 08:27, 27 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.