Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bukola Adeeyo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:07, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Bukola Adeeyo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable actress who falls short of WP:NACTOR A before I conducted shows her mentioned in trivial gossipy scandals of “husband snatching” I could not find any in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources that are non trivial or gossipy so per WP:GNG she doesn’t qualify as notable. Furthermore she hasn’t taken any significant roles/lead roles in movies she has featured in.Celestina007 (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. She has not appeared in any notable films and has not won any notable awards.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 13:47, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: I'm in two minds about this article. The subject has 1.2 million followers on Instagram, so I think the second criterion of WP:NACTOR is made out. As for the sources, I agree with the nominator that the topics of many of the articles are frivolous and gossipy—but, the coverage is significant and it is in reliable sources. I'm really not sure what to think about this one, but would be inclined to say that the subject is notable. Dflaw4 (talk) 01:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.