Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buledi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Buledi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Declined prod. Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Steps were taken to locate said sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Please do not hesitate to contact me should appropriate sources be located during the course of this discussion. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:50, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:06, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * KEEP: This article is about a historical tribe of Baloch people, and there are no extraordinary claims in article its simple encyclopedic article. I also add some more ref and details. Arslanali (talk) 15:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:13, 6 November 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep - I don't think that ref 4 is reliable but ref 3 is good. Probably borderline GNG pass Spiderone  15:14, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:08, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ethnic groups should always be considered notable if there is anything verifiable to say about them at all. SpinningSpark 01:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment According to user Spiderone, ref 4 is not reliable, but ref 4 is from Encyclopedia Sindhiana which is published by a semi-govt organization Sindhi Language Authority, so point is source is reliable. Arslanali (talk) 08:59, 16 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.