Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulldog Digital Media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Bulldog Digital Media

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No notability. The article has a lot of sources but a closer inspection will show its simply a listing of the brand along with other brands and not about the company itself. Most sources are also unreliable sources. CerealKillerYum (talk) 11:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as blatant promotion/spam. Regardless of notability, there is no salvageable content here. CorporateM (Talk) 17:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * DElete -- obviously trying to be an advert. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - An ordinary company founded recently with no significant coverage yet, with the being results this. SwisterTwister   talk  05:22, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.