Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullers Wood School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) '''As sufficient sources were found by another user to demonstrate notability, I am withdrawing the nomination. Thanks for finding sources.''' --Lenny Marks (talk) 19:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Bullers Wood School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I believe that the article fails notability per WP:NSCHOOL. The article cites no sources whatsoever, and I have done a search for mentions and have not found "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject," as required. Lenny Marks (talk) 10:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lenny Marks (talk) 10:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Lenny Marks (talk) 10:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:55, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

And WP:ORG says it has to be multiple sources. I tried, and failed, to find that. Did you manage to do so?
 * Keep. Easily meets WP:GNG, as does pretty much every other secondary school in the United Kingdom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:55, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see how it meets GNG as it says: "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."
 * Plenty of sources online. Oh, and as the nominator please don't vote twice. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:52, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah sorry, did not mean to vote twice. The problem I had was that the sources I found (with the exception of one) were not "independent" because they were either from the school website or seemed to be reports or material commissioned by the school. Obviously, if you managed to find independent, significant, mentions then it should not be deleted, but I do not see them. Sorry if I'm missing an obvious one. --Lenny Marks (talk) 11:08, 14 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. I added 5 articles clipped from newspapers.com to the article's talk page. Under WP:NEXIST,
 * See also NORG's alternate criteria and WP:NSCHOOLS, which exempt not-for-profit schools from the requirements of NORG. This article does need revision for neutral encyclopedic language and for addition of reliable sources, but since multiple reliable, independent sources do exist, the school therefore meets GNG. Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 16:12, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
 * See also NORG's alternate criteria and WP:NSCHOOLS, which exempt not-for-profit schools from the requirements of NORG. This article does need revision for neutral encyclopedic language and for addition of reliable sources, but since multiple reliable, independent sources do exist, the school therefore meets GNG. Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 16:12, 14 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.