Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullis Charter School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. No Guru 15:30, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Bullis Charter School
Lack of information, lack of notability. Matt 22:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Los Altos, California; the article fails to establish the notability of this school. A possible alternative would be to create an article along the lines of Education in Los Altos, California or something. Extraordinary Machine 23:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I would, of course, be voting keep here, but this seems to be a copyvio from the school website. It may need to be tagged and listed on the copyvio page. --JJay 00:12, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Current version doesn't look like a copyvio. Golfcam 02:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It's a small copy of this. Being so short, it's probably easily fixeable, which is why I haven't tagged it yet.  --Rob 03:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC) Copyvio is fixed.  --Rob 03:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - In addition to the usual reasons, there's probably more material than usual, since this is a charter, which generally attracts extra attention and controversy. Merging is bad, because it would remove the school from the Category:Charter schools category, where people expect to find such schools.  There isn't a clear target for a merge.  The school has signficance to both Los Altos, California (as the community it servers) and Los Altos School District (even though indepedent, the district was involved in its creation, and certain financial oversight).  As a stand-alone article, it can be linked to from any relevant articles, and included in all relevant categories.  --Rob 03:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per the long established precedent to retain school articles now that the copyvio problem has been resolved. Silensor 19:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I'm not a strong supporter of articles about any but the most notable schools, but no reason to single out this one.--Runcorn 10:11, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.