Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulusu Krishna Chaitanya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 12:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Bulusu Krishna Chaitanya

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Assistant prof, h index of 7, and likely autobiographical. No indication of meeting WP:NPROF. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:NPROF. Pretty much run-of-the-mill. RationalPuff (talk) 13:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable academic who does not meet our inclusion criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Current sources fails WP:NPROF. Cuoxo (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - no indication of meeting WP:NACADEMIC, and the sourcing doesn't meet the GNG. I can find no additional coverage online, either. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. NPROF C1 is not met, and that is the only criterion even remotely possible. JoelleJay (talk) 19:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Assistant professors rarely pass WP:PROF and he seems unexceptional in this regard. Certainly his citation counts are not yet in the range where he could pass C1. I can't find anything about his supposed "Thales Academia award" — searching brings up only copies of the sentence here saying he won it — so it seems clearly below the level where C2 would be possible. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per . He said it as best as I could. "It's all true." Bearian (talk) 20:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.