Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bummer

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 02:18, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Bummer
Previously listed for deletion (see old vote) with the result to transwiki. It has since been transwikied. It's just a dicdef without further potential, so delete. --Dmcdevit 01:13, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Bummer (Delete) since already transwikied. Master Thief Garrett 02:34, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, already in wiktionary, dictionary definition. Megan1967 02:36, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Turn it back into a tag. Kappa 04:05, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Carnildo 19:36, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, dicdef already transwikied, no potential for encyclopedic expansion. Bummer, dude.  Barno 20:51, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's a bummer but it has no encyclopedic potential. Physchim62 21:46, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Turn into a Disambiguation article - a bummer can be a Bad trip, a beggar, a lazy person, a homosexual, a 1973 film called Bummer!. Kingturtle 19:02, 15 May 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.