Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunbury Wildlife Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The argument to redirect is undermined by the absence of this term in the target article Vanamonde (Talk) 20:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Bunbury Wildlife Park

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I can find the usual deluge of TripAdvisor items, but nothing more susbstantial that would amount to solid independent coverage. It's quite possible that something may be hiding among all these listings, but I couldn't spot it. It seems that zoos often only get substantial coverage when there's some kind of scandal or blow-up (so kudos to Bunbury's for not generating news) but it makes it hard to present independent sourcing... -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:58, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:58, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:58, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete lacks notability. Balle010 (talk) 05:09, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. Pahiy (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to South Bunbury, Western Australia - users are required to consider alternatives to deletion and there is no indication that a redirect to the suburb name is inappropriate. Deus et lex (talk) 11:14, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.