Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bundaberg Christian College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:24, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Bundaberg Christian College

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Inncorrect/False Information Thingv2 (talk) 02:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Per established precedent described at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, we almost always keep articles about secondary schools unless a hoax is involved. The article has reliable, independent sources. Any incorrect information (what specifically do you mean?) should be corrected by normal editing, not deletion.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  06:01, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Per precedent. I agree with Cullen. -- Alarics (talk) 08:23, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Secondary schools are kept by long-standing precedent and consensus. No specific reasons for deletion given by nominator. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per Cullen. Nom does not provide any valid deletion criteria. AfD is WP:NOTCLEANUP, and the article talk page provides no indication of content problems. Also, the nom appears to be an SPA. -- 101.117.9.24 (talk) 14:50, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep -- since it teaches to year 12, it is a High School, which we normnally keep. However, it is a mere stub and needs to be taggged as such,  Peterkingiron (talk) 12:21, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, I don't agree at all with the reasoning that high schools should always be kept by virtue of being high schools. It will usually be the case that high schools will have the necessary secondary coverage to meet the WP:GNG, but not always, and the sources should be found first.  With that said, this school's policy of being one of the last schools in Queensland where beating children was acceptable seems to have gotten it the required coverage, so the article should be kept.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:03, 23 March 2014 (UTC).
 * Keep per longstanding precedent that secondary schools of confirmed existence are presumed to be notable. There are good reasons for this precedent which I support... Carrite (talk) 05:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.