Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bundesautobahn 643


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-26 14:11Z 

Bundesautobahn 643

 * — (View AfD)

Really not all that notable. Walton monarchist89 12:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. Precedent, to the extent that WP understands it, has included all US highways.  It seems appropriate to conclude that the highway systems of other countries should be so treated as well.  Admittedly, though, some extreme page format work seems to be in order.  Perhaps the project handling US highways would like to take an international vacation? :-) Serpent&#39;s Choice 14:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The formatting should be ok now, this revision was pretty bad :) --KFP (talk | contribs) 15:02, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: All US highways and many major roads have an individual article, as do all British motorways and major roads, so why shouldn't the German roads? This is a global encyclopaedia after all. Ben W Bell   talk  14:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. --KFP (talk | contribs) 14:53, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - I agree with Ben W Bell and Serpent's Choice. If roads are an acceptable subject in WP so should this road. Jayden54 15:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - any attempt to delete the corresponding article in the German-language Wikipedia would be a speedy keep, and every article there should have one in en:, too. (It's also a highway connecting two state capitals across a major navigable river, and one of not all that many ways to cross that river.) RandomP 15:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, basic information about major routes is considered encyclopedic. And no, it's not just any road, it's an autobahn. -- Kinu  t /c  17:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep An autobahn connecting two major metropolitan areas, not just some backroad. --Oakshade 22:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Only because an article is a stub is not enough reason for deleting. For the rest as per above. Ekki01 17:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletions.  -- Kusma (討論) 09:23, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep improve by all means, but there is enaugh precedent to keep. Agathoclea 10:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep As per above. Ekki01 17:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.