Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bundesverband Deutscher Liebhaberorchester


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:10, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Bundesverband Deutscher Liebhaberorchester

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No proof of notability.  Varun FEB2003    10:52, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep No understandable reasoning. National association for orchestras and musicians existing almost 100 years with 810 orchestras participating, a great music library and giving out its own magazine, should be enough. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 03:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: per WP:ARTN. Article is poor, but there is a strong assertion of notability. Doing some research, there are WP:RS available, although many of them are not in English. That, however, doesn't detract from the article meeting WP:GNG. Safehaven86 (talk) 16:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Leaning Keep -- Google book results return some mentions: link. I cannot tell how substantial this coverage is, but this organisation appears to be notable. There is a de.wiki article: link. It is unsourced, but provides some basic info. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 *  Varun FEB2003    13:29, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per SamWinchester and Safehaven86 as a notable organization. Ejgreen77 (talk) 14:39, 24 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.