Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bungay Black Dog Double Response


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  04:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Bungay Black Dog Double Response

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is an impressive-looking article, but it is unsourced, and searches find only Wikipedia and mirrors. The first version suggests that this is a purely local convention and, if not actually something made up one day, is neither notable nor even verifiable. The same goes for Weak squeak, from the same two authors. JohnCD (talk) 09:32, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep I had a search but couldn't find anything on it, but the does not mean it's not worth keeping, nor that its not true. There any many dozens, possibly hundreds of bidding systems for contract bridge, and a lot of the bidding systems are geographically dependent, and not well known outside their locality. I would keep the article until we can verify its veracity. scope_creep (talk) 21:19, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment How long do we wait? The article authors, or anyone else, have a week to produce sources if any exist, but your searches and mine have found none, and per WP:OR: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it", not to mention WP:V: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth". JohnCD (talk) 12:49, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete no reliable sources; fails WP:V Tassedethe (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no RSes I can find. Hobit (talk) 03:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.