Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunndle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Bunndle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be corp advertising WP:SPAM and lacks notability WP:CORPDEPTH. References are promotional primary sources and the company's own website. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Beyond basic 'hey we were funded by someone' coverage in tech rags dedicated to that niche, there is nothing there that could possibly meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP. § FreeRangeFrog croak 00:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, no significant coverage from multiple non-primary reliable sources. Subject of the AfD does not appear to be notable as defined by WP:GNG or WP:ORG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could not find sources to satisfy WP:CORP. Not noteworthy at this point.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 10:43, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.