Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BunsenLabs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 12:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

BunsenLabs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominating on behalf of anonymous editor. "Reason for deletion tag: non notable, citations are all to the official website of the software which the article covers. It has been this way for 6+ months with no edits (and in my research) no notable coverage. Until it gets some, why does it need an article here that's only a stub? 2601:603:4302:79BB:221:6AFF:FE95:653C (talk) 3:05 pm, Today (UTC−7)" clpo13(talk) 23:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 23:04, 20 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable Linux distribution. It is so easy to create a Linux distribution, especially when you base it off an existing one like they have done. No evidence that this example of doing it (like many others) is in any way notable. SJK (talk) 08:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.