Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buomesca Tué Na Bangna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 01:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Buomesca Tué Na Bangna

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD by author with no reason given, player has not made his first team debut therefore fails WP:NFOOTBALL & has also not received significant media coverage & also fails WP:GNG. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 13:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 13:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 13:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 13:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.  Don't see how a player who has yet to make a senior appearance can be deemed notable unless he's received an unusually large amount of coverage, which he doesn't appear to have. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT since what coverage there is, is trivial, and Mr. Bangna has not appeared in a fully pro league. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Life  talk  16:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. --Reckless182 (talk) 12:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.