Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bupane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. as hoax. Several commenters revealed falsehoods in the article and all attempts at finding sources have failed. All we can assume now, is that it's not truthful. Mgm|(talk) 13:53, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Bupane

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Either a hoax, or a really messed up article. &eta;oian  &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  03:40, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Boiling point is the same as Butane, which cannot be right for a combination. Also, SMILES as a identification number?! Bottom says Molecular Formula, C4H10, which is Butane.  &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  03:46, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as hoax. Most of this is copied from Butane (the health effects, some of the infobox) and hydrocarbon (the lead and first section from that article).--chaser - t 03:47, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Lastly, A chemical structure is not a reaction formula (one that doesn't even use the equilibrium sign) &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  03:49, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete as WP:BALLS. Google search turns up what appears to be surnames, and specifically asked me if I meant to search for Butane.  That, and I may not be a chemistry major, but last I recall, butane and propane were on different rings of the distillation process. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 03:51, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I think this is some attempt at an article for "Butane?" Regardless, I too search out the term, and did not find anything; therefore, recommend deletion of an article "...for which all attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed" as per Deletion_policy. kilbad (talk) 03:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as complete bollocks. Reyk  YO!  04:12, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this nonsense quickly; we're wasting electrons. Drmies (talk) 05:21, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this is taking too long already, what a pane. JBsupreme (talk) 06:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:SNOW, anyone? &eta;oian  &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  06:25, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not opposed, but an uninvolved admin should do it if anyone does.--chaser - t 07:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.