Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burger dot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Not really any sourced content to justify a merge. MastCell Talk 15:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Burger dot

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unverifiable, source that is linked to has no mention of it. Lack of support from search engines suggests it is therefore not notable. Was prodded, but template was removed by author at 5 day mark. Sounds like a bullet point to me. |→ Spaully₪† 13:44, 8 May 2007 (GMT)
 * For reference the author has linked to a number of sources on the talk page, however they are all blogs or forums so I suggest do not adhere to WP:RS. |→ Spaully₪† 14:10, 8 May 2007 (GMT)


 * Delete; if this is notable, any information on the subject probably belongs at bullet (typography). Not quite the same as Benday dots, and beware of dangerous Kirby dots. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with bullet (typography). Damn, I thought they'd figured out how to miniaturize burgers into bite-size snacks. Phony Saint
 * Delete. There is nothing here that is sourced and therefore nothing that ought to be merged.  Speculative at best, hoaxy at worst.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 16:10, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with Bullet (typography). This type of information should be consolidated into one article. --YbborTalk 02:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Personally I don't see any reliable sources even to merit a mention on the bullet page.  |→ Spaully₪† 09:49, 14 May 2007 (GMT)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.