Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burial Chamber Trio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JohnCD (talk) 11:07, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Burial Chamber Trio

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article has never had any reliable independent sources. It asserts notability solely by inheritance (which, as we all kn ow, is invalid). Guy (Help!) 23:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 18 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. The band contains three notable musicians. Per WP:BAND ctiterion 6, consensus is that this makes a band notable. The band has also received sufficient coverage to have a properly referenced article, e.g., , , , , , .--Michig (talk) 09:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Band with multiple independently notable members who have two releases on an important label. (I have added some refs, mostly just for verification). duffbeerforme (talk) 21:53, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.