Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burly Bear


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:47, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Burly Bear

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional page for Instagram dog, created and largely written by SPA. WP:BEFORE shows two pieces of local coverage, and another "Burly Bear" that isn't the dog. No evidence this passes WP:NWEB or WP:GNG. SPA creator tried to restore the WP:DAILYMAIL as a source, presumably because that's one of the few there was - David Gerard (talk) 23:22, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 23:22, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 23:22, 13 December 2019 (UTC)


 * There are numerous articles which I am yet to post on to this wikipedia page, it just finding the time. he has been featured on lost of different newspapers and it is my first page that i have created there was no need to turn round and type so what when i thought it was an important piece to include. Yahoo Mirror Daily mail daily hearald it was put back on because he is in the article.
 * Please reread the Wikipedia notability guidelines. The Daily Mail is a deprecated source and shouldn't be used for anything, let alone a claim of notability - David Gerard (talk) 00:45, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Cavalryman (talk) 14:00, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok what about Yahoo mirror? All the others and the articles from different countries — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki11221122 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * You mean, the Yahoo! mirror of the literally paid press releases site? Syndicated sources are judged by the reliability of the original site - David Gerard (talk) 23:02, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails GNG. (The Southwark News, eh?)  William Harris Canis lupis track.svg talk Canis lupis track.svg 08:28, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, I found nothing significant for this article to pass notability. Alex-h (talk) 23:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'd say there is lots of coverage, but it's decidedly trashy and/or local interest. Any dog would be ashamed of this page. Bearian (talk) 15:39, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG thoroughly.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 23:38, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete there is no evidence to pass it on to WP:GNG.- Nahal (T) 21:34, 20 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.