Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burma National Revolutionary Army


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Myanmar Royal Dragon Army. Discussion about which of the two titles the merged article should have can continue in the Talk page. Owen&times; &#9742;  01:06, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Burma National Revolutionary Army

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Direct duplication of content from Myanmar Royal Dragon Army, currently a content fork of Myanmar Royal Dragon Army. If this rename becomes the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, can move the other page title accordingly- no RS showing any significant differences.  EmeraldRange  (talk/contribs) 12:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions.  EmeraldRange  (talk/contribs) 12:23, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Pinging @Espresso Addict as someone involved in prior WP:PROD for thoughts. Additional comment: it is a direct fork (i.e. someone created this article by copying content from the other) so content should already be in the other article.  EmeraldRange  (talk/contribs) 15:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Merge with Myanmar Royal Dragon Army - there's no rationale for the two articles. Probably it should go under the current name. Llajwa (talk) 21:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.