Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burnham Beeches Golf Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kieran207 ( talk - Contribs ) 02:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Burnham Beeches Golf Club

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable golf course. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete The article is a stub, and the only source is the course's website.TH1980 (talk) 03:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete As with all of these mass-created articles, the key is to identify the original source (in this case a list of the top 100 Golf courses in each county of the UK). Plainly not based on a reliable source and/or not significant coverage, possibly created by algorithm or at least just cut/pasted text given who created it. A search on GNews shows only local coverage, which makes this not a pass for WP:NORG since at least regional/national coverage is needed per WP:AUD. FOARP (talk) 13:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Several sources have been added to the article that show national coverage. wjematherplease leave a message... 14:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. There has been a little significant coverage. The club also lays claim to being the oldest in Buckinghamshire, and has hosted a Ladies European Tour event. wjematherplease leave a message... 14:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Wjemather † Encyclopædius  12:03, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. The sources provided show the course has been discussed in some depth by various independent sources. A web search indicates that more sources and information could be added. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:43, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - the sourcing added after being put up for deletion are enough to pass WP:GNG, in my view. They might not be enough for other guidelines but, for golf courses, passing GNG should be sufficient. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note to closer this AfD was inappropriately closed early and needs to be left open at least 75 minutes past 7 days to meet our minimum open deadline. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Not the most notable golf course, but I'm finding additional blurbs on top of what's already in the article for hosting minor local professional matches in the 1930s. I'm not sure if Burnham Beeches is an article, but at worst it could be merged there. SportingFlyer  T · C  15:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources added by Wjemather which show sustained non-trivial coverage over time. Passes WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 22:25, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.