Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burnley Rugby Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:45, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Burnley Rugby Club

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Local rugby club with no indication of notability. Unreferenced. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 00:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:37, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Have updated, Sufficent??? --Trappedinburnley (talk) 20:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GROUP. Also lacks a NPOV, but that could be corrected. Davnor (talk) 14:56, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - Changing my vote; Significant changes have been made to the article since its nomination, sufficient to establish at least minimal notability.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - any rugby team which can field 3 XVs is notable enough.--MacRusgail (talk) 16:24, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * keep - Whilst I'm not going to claim that a team in the 7th tier of a national league system is hugely notable, I've seen pages on here with much less info, and in my opinion at least, less importance.Trappedinburnley (talk) 17:40, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per my comments above.--MacRusgail (talk) 00:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.