Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burnout records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Burnout records
Prod removed without discussion. Non-notable record company. They have not actually released any records. Fails WP:CORP and any other notability test I can think of. Dipics 16:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Akradecki 16:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The company only began trading in 2006, and HAS released a record, and currently has another in the works due to be released before the end of March 2007.Antony.doyle 16:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC) [Note: preceding comment was improperly put on discussion page, I'm copying it to here verbatim for record completeness. Akradecki 16:57, 12 September 2006 (UTC)]
 * Comment A record company that has only released one record and only started "trading" this year is, by definition, not notable. Dipics 17:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This company may yet be notable, but only then will an article be warranted. Erechtheus 18:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete New company that does not meet any of the guidelines of WP:CORP at this time. DrunkenSmurf  18:58, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.