Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burns & Trauma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:47, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Burns & Trauma

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 11:41, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per Randykitty. Web search isn't turning up anything about the journal besides its own website. - Iago Qnsi  12:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Promotional spam. The only reference us to the subscription website page, External links are in Chinese, with no English Translation. NB: this is not the only promotional article, with unverifiable Chinese language references by this editor. He has also recreated a BLP one, which was deleted under db-g11 criteria. Richard Harvey (talk) 13:29, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Are Burns & Trauma a crime-solving duo?  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 18:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I wouldn't classify this as promotional spam. It's a journal published by the Chinese Medical Association, which apparently has about 70 titles in its stable. As to its notability - possibly in the Chinese medicine arena but a bit too arcane for Wikipedia criteria. No, I think they were in The Simpsons ;) ► Philg88 ◄  ♦talk 09:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Excellent!  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 09:33, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.