Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burns Road Kay Romeo Juliet

Burns Road Kay Romeo Juliet

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Neutral nomination. Bringing here for consensus after disputed draftification and re-creation at Burns Road Kay Romeo Juliet (2024) by a number of socks. Not alleging libra is a sock, but this needs resolution in one direction or the other as the current situation is not sustainable. Star  Mississippi  01:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan.  Star   Mississippi  01:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: I will withhold my vote for now, until I make sure if it meets the GNG or not. But it's worth noting that the article on this topic has been created multiple times by socks of our prolific WP:PE and if this is also a case of UPE, it would be a clear violation of WP:TOU. —  Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 08:52, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_ARY_Digital: for now, as a compromise; but opposed to deletion given coverage on production; bylined review: . - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  10:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC) or Keep given the other bylined review in a notable media, added recently with other sources.- My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank)  20:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes Redirection make sense, to me as well. By the way, do I need to reiterate that youlinmagazine is not a RS and should not be used to meet the GNG. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 10:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You can reiterate what you wish, but there is absolutely no consensus on Youlin not being reliable and it can be used on the target page as a relatively independent bylined (:D) source for verification about the content of the program, in the present case. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  10:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * So what if there's no consensus for Youlin yet? Sometimes one should Ignore all rules and use WP:COMMONSENSE because WP:CONTEXTMATTERS. And indeed it can be used on the target page as a relatively independent bylined Who said one can't use it? However, I mentioned that one cannot use it to justify GNG, especially since the author of this review piece is a guest contributor with merely two published articles under their by-line. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 13:37, 19 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_ARY_Digital although it received coverage but being a creator of this article, i dont want to entertain socks as the page is badly infected by socks just after its creation. Libraa2019 (talk) 12:54, 20 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Redirect to, List_of_programs_broadcast_by_ARY_Digital as topic on lack it's notability and cited sources clearly not yet shown the notability to standa_lone.223.123.11.155 (talk) 19:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)