Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burnt Generation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. v/r - TP 00:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Burnt Generation

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a Neologism. A search for sources proves it is not a notable term. Fages (talk) 21:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  — Logan Talk Contributions 03:03, 31 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep One or two examples found at Google News and half a dozen citations at Google Books suggest that the term is in fairly common use. More of this material needs to be incorporated into the article, which is mostly WP:Original research as it stands, but this does seem to be an established term. --MelanieN (talk) 01:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 6 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment - Generation X has mentions of itself being called by different names (13th Generation). Would a Merge and Redir to Section be possible? Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 05:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep seems plausibly-notable to me. Also added to WikiProject Iran to try and attract people knowledgeable in the field. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:09, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.