Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burnt Offering


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:30, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Burnt Offering

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable fanzine; no reliable references in the article and none on the internets (besides the archive on Worldpress). Drmies (talk) 01:19, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 13 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Holocaust (sacrifice) - the title is a likely search term, but not for the subject in question. I don't think there is a need to disambiguate the term to include this obviously non-notable fan-zine or the non-notable album that came after it. And the fact that someone named their album after the fan-zine does not make said fan-zine notable, in my view, especially given the apparent direct connection between the two. Stalwart 111  02:44, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Extra note - the un-capitalised Burnt offering already redirects to Holocaust (sacrifice). If people are convinced nobody will accidentally capitalise "offering" in this instance, then I support deletion. Stalwart 111  02:47, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, I tell you what I'd like: to move Burnt Offering (Galzy novel). Drmies (talk) 02:54, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd have no problem with that either, how about...


 * Replace with the content of Burnt Offering (Galzy novel) - someone searching for the capitalised title is likely looking for the book rather than the non-notable punk fan-zine. Just keep the see also tag at the top to direct people to Holocaust (sacrifice) if that is what they were looking for. Stalwart 111  03:28, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * And we need to sort out Burnt offering (disambiguation). Stalwart 111  03:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Support whatever Stalwart says, since he's a good guy . Actually, I'd say Redirect to either Holocaust (sacrifice), Burnt Offering (Galzy novel), or Burnt offering (disambiguation) - I'd prefer the last, since it's a conceivable search term (some people think of titles on Wikipedia like titles of essays or books - every word capitalized), but any of them really are okay. Ansh666 04:49, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete the present article. A magazine that ran for 12 issues is clearly NN.  I would suggfest that the space should be used for Burnt offering (disambiguation).  I note there is a capnote at present.  If that is not on the dabpage it should be.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:08, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * My view would be to Delete this article and move Burnt offering (disambiguation) to this title. None of the topics at the disambig page are clearly a primary topic in this case.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:29, 23 June 2013 (UTC).


 * Delete - I really want it to be notable, but it's not verifiable. If it were a little earlier (say 1976) I'd be more enthused.  The train had pretty much left the punk station by 1979. - Richfife (talk) 01:02, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete and turn into a redirect to Burnt offering (disambiguation), as Ansh said. I think anything else is going to cause a lot of confusion. It's far too easy to link to Burnt Offerings (novel) instead of Burnt Offering (Galzy novel), and that's just tragic. Grayfell (talk) 06:26, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.