Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burr Ridge Village Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Arguments asserting that the subject matter is notable do not provide adequate evidence to support such claims. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:38, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Burr Ridge Village Center

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable shopping center, almost entirely a list of stores at the mall which is not allowed. Flowery tone, no sources given, no sources found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:24, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not Notable. --WngLdr34 (talk) 18:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep This is an assembly of notable stores and it seems to fit in with the other centers at Chicagomalls.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:36, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * So basically WP:OSE, right? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 15:30, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It just seems that shopping centers like these have passed notability.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 17:32, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 20:46, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per A7 - this article about an organisation does not assert its notability. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete.  No attempt to establish any form of notability.  Could be a speedy as spam! If closed as a delete, remove the link from the template! Vegaswikian (talk) 22:50, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete – if it was notable, there would be some substance to it, rather than just a semi-sourced and semi-relevant list of clients. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► Speaker ─╢ 20:49, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable structure, "flowery tone" is irrelevant to AFD -Drdisque (talk) 19:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.