Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Busan Urban Bus Route No. 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Deltree (delete all).  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 00:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Busan Urban Bus Route No. 2

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod(s) removed by author. Non-notable series of bus routes all added by same author. Wikipedia is not a directory (WP:NOT) or travel guide (WP:NOTTRAVEL). justinfr (talk/contribs) 12:08, 15 September 2008 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

I've asked the author, User:Xxchangwoo0120xx, to stop creating these but he/she has continued, saying they're the same as List of Melbourne bus routes (which they're not, because that's a list). If he continues to add routes, I'll just pile them on here too. justinfr (talk/contribs) 12:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete all as non-notable routes lacking third-party reference sources for verification. --DAJF (talk) 14:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete covering every bus route in the world is simply not something one can reasonably expect an encyclopedia to do. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:25, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete -- We have had similar discussions about bus routes elsewhere. Pages about these are liable to require a lot of maintenance, which will not necessarily be done.  However the bus company will maintain its own website.  I am not sure if even lists are acceptable.  If they are they should be brief and have an appropriate external link.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Just so I don't come off as a curmudgeon for nominating an editor's entire contribution history, he also created a main article, Busan Urban Bus, which I left off the list because I think that at least has the potential to become an article, though it's not much in its current state. justinfr (talk/contribs) 23:06, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - same reason as nominator. There's a related template at TFD here. Somno (talk) 00:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and condense into a "Routes" section on Busan Urban Bus. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:36, 16 September 2008 (UTC).
 * Delete. If we compare railway or subway lines to bus routes, then rail systems are more permanent and fit better into an encyclopedia. Bus routes can, and often do, change frequently, and an encyclopedia cannot be expected to keep track of things like that. Lankiveil's proposal for a "routes" section in the main Busan Urban Bus article is a good one, but I don't see the content of this article being particularly mergeable. Sjakkalle (Check!)  15:06, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.