Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bush Pioneer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep per demonstrated notability as outlined in the discussion below. Non-admin close. -- jonny - m t  07:28, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Bush Pioneer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article Bush Pioneer is does not meet the notability criteria for wikipedia. It should be merged into Bush's campaigns articles or deleted. Boomgaylove (talk) 02:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. I really fail to see how this isn't notable (it's had a lot of coverage in past years, though not so much lately). And wasn't this nominated once before already? Duncan1800 (talk) 21:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Looking twice, I would say that some of the extraneous links could probably be removed, and there is a touch of bias in places (such as "Bush Pioneers involved in criminal investigations"), but that still doesn't warrant deletion by itself. Duncan1800 (talk) 21:07, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, notability demonstrated by sources. Seems to be an importance argument. (Disclaimer: I think I edited this a while back, not bothering to check though.) --Dhartung | Talk 23:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable due to coming up in a number of media controversies, e.g. Ken Lay as mentioned in the article. Any bio of a Bush Pioneer ought to be able to link to an article explaining exactly what that means, with context. Kalkin (talk) 23:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability and verifiability requirements are satisfied by the references provided in the article. Edison (talk) 03:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.