Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bush family conspiracy theory (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:07, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Bush family conspiracy theory
Do not delete--highly relevant links and informations!

After all the original research has been cleared out, all that is left is a single paragraph and a huge list of external links. DCAnderson 23:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete conspiracycruft. Danny Lilithborne 00:34, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete AntiBushcruft SM247 02:53, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete pointless &mdash;M e ts501 talk 04:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Totally pointless conspiracycruft that hardly even explains itself. Grand  master  ka  05:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|20px]] Delete -- violates WP:V, WP:NOR, and WP:RS, plus conspiracycruft, cause I like that word. Morton devonshire 07:05, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If we delete this, will the author(s) think we're part of the consiracy? ~ trialsanderrors 03:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * DON'T DELETE ANYTHING — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.158.160.146 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per nom; too few secondary sources to be viable. Tom Harrison Talk 18:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It would be nice to have an actual article/explanation above all those links... I wouldn't say "delete", though. It's worthy of discussion, yes?
 * Delete Nothing in it worth keeping at this stage. FearÉIREANN [[Image:Map of Ireland's capitals.png|15px]]\(caint)|undefined 21:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Cleanup The fact is that there are numerous Bush family conspiracy theories - which is the focus of the page. Remove the abundant links and start over.  To delete it is to disallow the reality that there are theories which belong on the page, when they can be appropriately cited.  Wikipedia is not censored.  S-P 03:01, 7 June 2006 (UTC) Note: This is the user's 2nd edit, first being creating their userpage.
 * Delete I respect the devotion put into collecting those links (must have spent hours bookmarking and stuff...), but it's all the aforementioned cruft and more. -- 0zymandias 01:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: It's just a collection of links which Wikipedia is NOT.  Scoutersig 01:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I too respect the time that went into the creation of this, but feel it just doesn't belong here. GassyGuy 07:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.