Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business-to-Consumer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:48, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Business-to-Consumer

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

WP:DICTDEF. This is a self-explanatory term used to describe one of several electronic business models; they are all listed at electronic business and if necessary should be described there rather than in subarticles of this kind.  Sandstein  15:05, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per "not a dictionary." Borock (talk) 17:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:17, 6 July 2012 (UTC)


 * What about the other articles referenced in Electronic business though, do you think they should all be merged there? Some have significantly more information then this one. Amalthea  06:38, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * That's a case-by-case matter. I haven't looked at all of them, but if they are individually notable and go beyond a dictionary definition, they can probably remain.  Sandstein   07:41, 21 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Σ σ  ς . 02:35, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 21:46, 20 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as a non-notable neologism unlikely to be expanded beyond a dictionary definition due to its extreme breadth. G. C. Hood (talk) 02:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete but possibly redirect to electronic business as that gives some info on what the phrase means and particularly the context in which it is used. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.