Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BusinessEnergyQuotes.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

BusinessEnergyQuotes.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

completely non-notable website/company. Fails WP:NWEB. No independent coverage also appears to be a paid for advert. Praxidicae (talk) 17:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - was writing up an AfD of my own for this article following my decline of Prax's G11. Non-notable, all coverage I can find is WP:MILL with a healthy dose of advertorial or churnalism (including a number of "news articles" by energylivenews.com and netimesmagazine.co.uk which, despite having different bylines, appear to basically be the same press releases with a little independent paraphrasing on top). GeneralNotability (talk) 17:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I think it was a valid G11, but in ay event the firm is not notable--the references do not meet WP:NCORP.  DGG ( talk ) 23:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - blatant advertising. Deb (talk) 08:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - likely paid-for spam. I've blocked the author for this. MER-C 14:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No references meet the criteria for establishing notability, fails NCORP/GNG  HighKing++ 13:21, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SPAM, WP:NCORP, and WP:SIGCOV. There is no evidence at all of news coverage. Bearian (talk) 16:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.