Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business 2 Community


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Business 2 Community

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A spammy article about a non-notable black hat SEO platform. BEFORE search finds nothing useful, and the existing sourcing is as follows:


 * Forbes – "Brand contributor" piece – unreliable.
 * Bluefocusmarketing – Not really coverage, not an RS.
 * Constantcontact – Blog. Unreliable.
 * performancing.com – I had explicitly tell my ad-blocker that I want to visit this one, which probably says something. It also isn't coverage.
 * business2community – SPS, useless for notability.
 * original9.com – Blog, not an RS.
 * Ad Age – 404.
 * evancarmichael.com – Blog, listicle, unreliable.
 * business2community #2 – SPS.

Hence delete. Blablubbs | talk 11:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Blablubbs | talk 11:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Blablubbs | talk 11:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Blablubbs | talk 11:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. None of the references are WP:RS. SunDawn (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.